Strategically helping Colorado clients through divorce & custody cases
Published on:

courtroom-1-1236725-300x201By: Sarah T. McCain

When you start a family case, the first document that you will receive from the court is called the Case Management Order. This order often includes a Notice of Initial Status Conference. After working in this field for many years, I continue to be surprised by the number of individuals who simply receive these documents and set them aside, without even bothering to read them. Both documents provide important information that could be vital to ensuring that your case gets off on the right foot.  Failing to review and follow the CMO can potentially lead to negative results in your case.

First, the NOISC that you receive either provides a date in which you will meet with the court for the very first time or it provides the information on how to go about scheduling this very first meeting. This Initial Status Conference is required as part of the case, pursuant to statute, and it can only be vacated under very specific circumstances, such as when when the correct document (a Stipulated Case Management Plan) is filed to let the court know that this conference is not necessary. However, in most cases you will need to attend this conference.  Continue reading

Published on:

gettyimages-480523000-612x612-300x200

By Michelle L. Searcy

While browsing the news one morning, I recently came across an article discussing some “surprising” divorce laws throughout the country and wondered how those laws compare to Colorado laws on the same subjects.  This article, which will be posted in two parts, explores those comparisons.

In Arkansas, couples have the option to enter a strict “covenant marriage.”  If that option is chosen, getting a divorce becomes more difficult.  Those in a covenant marriage must attend marriage counseling and separate for a specific time period before a divorce will be granted.  Colorado does not require marriage counseling or any period of separation prior to filing for a divorce.  However, given the cost, stress and impact of divorce on the parties and the children, it may be worthwhile to attend marriage counseling to explore possibilities of reconciliation voluntarily

California law includes a statutory six month waiting period before a divorce will be final.  Colorado has a statutory waiting period too.  However, in Colorado, the court can enter a Decree of Dissolution of Marriage 91 days after service of the petition.  It is not unusual for divorce cases to take six months to one year to be finalized depending on the circumstances. Continue reading

Published on:

furniture-2-1482437-300x217

In my experience, nothing seems to annoy a judge more than being required to allocate who gets the personal property acquired during a marriage – TVs, beds, tables, paintings, etc. Accordingly, most attorneys tell their clients to try figure it out among themselves.  When valuing personal property in a divorce, unlike insurance valuations, courts generally use “garage sale” values to determine what tangible personal property is worth, and almost invariably, it’s not worth much. Keep in mind that courts are vested with discretion to divide marital property in a divorce as they deem to be fair.

Thus, when you are paying your attorney $250 – $350 per hour, arguing over who gets the 2 year old flat-screen or the used king-sized bedroom set, the divorcing couple needs to make a cost-benefit determination of whether a fight over a possession is financially worth it, or whether to just take a deep breath and buy a replacement item. Continue reading

Published on:

time-is-money-1238344

By: Jessica A. Saldin

In most divorce cases, the parties are either still living together when the case begins or have recently separated.  However, it is also not uncommon for parties to have separated several months, or even years, before the divorce case is filed.  In my experience that can be for a variety of reasons.  In some cases the parties wanted to take time to attempt reconciliation.  In others, the parties simply never got around to filing. Furthermore, in some cases one party left and the other party did not want to file because they did not want the divorce to happen.  In sum, there may be a variety of other reasons why spouses wait lengthy times to file for divorce.  Regardless of the reasons, if the parties do get to the point of filing a divorce case, a common and reasonable question many parties ask is: what, if any, effect could this long period of separation have on the division of marital property and debts?  When reading this article, keep in mind that the court has the power to divide all marital property accrued up to the date of the decree.

The only time that marital property and/or debt acquired during a period of separation will be automatically set aside as one party’s separate property or debt is if it was a period of legal separation.  Legal separation is a formal legal process, similar to a divorce, and whether it may be the best fit for your situation will be discussed in a future blog post.  If you have received a decree of legal separation, property obtained after that point will be considered your separate property.  If you are not legally separated, though, and have only physically separated, the answer to the effect such separation has on the property and debt division is not as clear cut.

It is important to be aware of the fact that property acquired during the marriage, even during long periods of physical separation, is considered marital property.  Same with debt accrued during that time.  Therefore, if you are considering a divorce, it is best to start the process sooner rather than later to get resolution and to avoid property you acquire being considered marital property (to which your spouse could be entitled) and debt your spouse acquires being considered marital (part of which you could get stuck paying). Continue reading

Published on:

meeting-room-1499653-300x226By Michelle L. Searcy

Whether you are involved in a divorce (dissolution of marriage), child custody (allocation of parental rights), or modification family law case, you will be encouraged, if not ordered to participate in mediation.  In mediation, the mediator will work with you to try to resolve issues through agreement.  This confidential process gives you and the other party an opportunity to control the outcome of the case by reaching an agreement instead of having a stranger decide for you.  You may not resolve all of the issues.  Even if you are only able to reach agreements on some issues, it will help you pare down your court hearing time to focus on the issues that truly cannot be settled.

As a family law attorney, I have represented many clients through the mediation process.  Mediation does not always result in a successful outcome.  Often, I have heard clients express the opinion that mediation wasted time and money.  This article will help you avoid that feeling by focusing on ways to get the maximum benefit from mediation.  That said, mediation can frustrate the parties because the mediator lacks the authority to make either party agree to anything, or make decisions.  Some mediators apply pressure to the parties with the hopes of encouraging compromise.  It helps to keep in mind that the mediator’s judgment does not necessarily reflect the analysis the court may make when assessing a case. Continue reading

Published on:

whistle-1505616-300x226By:  Sarah T. McCain

In cases involving  child custody, especially those of a high conflict nature, you may hear the term “PCDM” mentioned as you near the end of litigation or settlement communications. It is often the recommendations of a Child and Family Investigator or Parental Responsibilities Evaluation that open discussions regarding whether to appoint a PCDM to a case.  However, you must first know what a PCDM is before you can assess whether one would be beneficial to you and to your family before making this commitment. 

A PCDM is a parenting coordinator/decision maker. You can appoint one person to fill this role and, once appointed, they may remain in this position for a period of up to two years, though their appointment can be terminated earlier by agreement of the parties or order of the court.   Appointments generally begin following the conclusion of a case and once court orders concerning parenting time and parental responsibilities have been entered. The role of the PC/DM is actually two different roles and a person can be appointed to do either, or, or both.  Parenting Coordinators and Decision Makers have different rules, functions, and consequences (for the parties). Continue reading

Published on:

missing-a-piece-to-my-puzzle-1532155-300x225

In prior blog posts, we have discussed the duty of financial disclosures in a divorce.  Under Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure 16.2 (e), Colorado law not only requires an absolute duty to disclose one’s financial situation, but also how a failure to accurately disclose, whether by non-disclosure or misstated disclosure, allows a court to re-allocate the assets of a marital estate within the 5 years  subsequent to the final Decree of Dissolution, once a material omission of disclosure is shown.

The Colorado Court of Appeals has since, recently, taken that a step further.  Whereas a spouse, presumably before, had to come to court with proof or knowledge that the other spouse materially misrepresented or omitted disclosure of a material asset, now the Court of Appeals lowers significantly the threshold upon which a spouse can re-open litigation over the division of a marital estate.

In Marriage of Durie, 2017 CA 1295, the court permitted a spouse to reopen a case under C.R.C.P 16.2 (e) based upon “information and belief” that a material omission or misstatement of disclosure occurred, and that by meeting a showing beyond just vague “suspicions and speculations,” that party could additionally seek “discovery” (a procedure authorized by court rule to allow one party to obtain information and documentation from the other party) to attempt to demonstrate that the other party failed in its obligation to provide accurate information. Continue reading

Published on:

documents-1427202-300x226By: Stephen J. Plog

Having spoken with thousands of people over the years regarding their Colorado divorce and child custody cases, one common topic of discussion is that of evidence, within the context of what can or cannot be used in court.  There are many common misbeliefs about what is good evidence, meaning something the court can accept and use for purposes of formulating its ruling.   For example, sometimes people ask whether it would help for them to have friends or other third persons write letters, whether attesting to an event they’ve witnessed or perhaps as to someone’s “character.”   Each time this is asked, I am compelled to let people know that letters from third persons are not going to be helpful (generally) and are going to be considered inadmissible hearsay.  The second part of my response is always going to be that we will need the potential letter writer to attend court to testify.  The Colorado Rules of Evidence dictate what is or is not going to be admissible evidence in a divorce or child custody case.    In this blog post, I will attempt to give a basic tutorial regarding what will or won’t be admitted. Continue reading

Published on:

money-money-money-1241634-300x226By:  Michelle L. Searcy

At the most basic level, the Colorado child support calculation is based on the combined income of the parents, the number of children and the number of overnights exercised by each parent in Colorado.  Calculating income for a parent with a job that issues a W-2 is a fairly straight forward process.  However, less traditional forms of income have the potential to complicate calculating child support.  One of the more difficult issues in determining child support occur when a disability occurs with parents, step-parents, or children.  This article addresses those issues under the child support statute, section 14-10-115, C.R.S.

However, death and disability payments are treated differently depending on who is disabled (or deceased) and who is the named recipient of the benefit.  These distinctions determine whether the benefit is considered as income to the parent, income to the child, or an offset against a child support obligation.  As set forth below, the interplay between child support and social security benefits can be somewhat complex. Continue reading

Published on:

accounting-calculator-tax-return-1241864-300x226By: Jessica A. Saldin,

Starting in January each year, almost every party in a divorce case has the same question, “How do I file my taxes for the prior year?”  As long as you were legally married for the pendency of the entire prior year, you could file married filing jointly.  However, many parties ask themselves if, being in the middle of a divorce, that is the best way to file.  How to file taxes during a divorce is not an uncommon question.

The first goal is, obviously, to see if you and the other party can agree on how you will file.  If you cannot agree, though, the other option is to get guidance from the court as to how you should file.  If you have a status conference in your case between the beginning of the year and the filing deadline, you could ask the judge if he or she has any general guidance.  The general ruling of the court is that parties to a divorce case should file taxes in the manner most beneficial to both parties.  This does not mean that if it is most beneficial to you to file separately you should file in such way, regardless of the impact on the other party.  This means the method of filing should be the most beneficial to both parties combined (i.e., it may not be the absolute best way for one party to file but it is better overall for both parties combined).  If you do not know which way would be the most beneficial, it is advised that you ask a CPA to run scenarios for both individual filings and a joint filing.  After you have both scenarios, average the individual filings and see if that outcome would be better, overall, for both parties or worse.  For example, if filing separately would get one party a refund of $5,000 and the other party would owe $2,000 and filing jointly would get both parties a combined refund of $4,000, the most beneficial filing for both parties is filing jointly (that is a combined refund of $4,000 as opposed to a combined net refund of $3,000 from the individual filings).  To be clear, this does not mean you have to file jointly.  If you both agree to file separately, it is highly unlikely the court would force you to file jointly even if that would be most beneficial.  However, if you are unable to reach an agreement, and need to ask the court for assistance, filing in the manner most jointly beneficial is the most likely outcome from the court.